Rorke’s Drift

Following the dreadful defeat of British troops at Isandlwana on January 22, 1879, a small British outpost/hospital called “Rorke’s Drift” – a bare dozen miles from the site of the massacre – quickly mobilized.  They hastily built walls and fortifications with mealie bags between a series of buildings and a cattle kraal.   The 150 defenders settled down to wait.   They didn’t wait long.  By late afternoon, about 4,000 Zulus fresh from The Washing of the Spears (from the title of the magnificent book by Donald R. Morris on the history of the Zulu campaign) descended on the small outpost.  And attacked.  

As at the Battle of Isandlwana, the Zulus configured their attack like the head of a water buffalo — the horns surrounding the enemy and the head and chest crushing forward.  The battle raged through the night and into the morning.  The defenders fell back into smaller and smaller redoubts.  The 150 defenders poured a withering fire at the Zulus a bare foot or two beneath the mealie bag walls. 

 By morning, the small garrison still held – suffering a few score of casualties.  Zulu casualties ran into the hundreds.  And the Zulus fell back as reinforcements were detected in the distance.  The defenders – the 24th Foot Regiment – succeeded in winning more Victoria Crosses (11) than any other regiment in British military history.  And 85 years later, a Hollywood offering captured with historic accuracy this pivotal battle.  The movie “Zulu.”      


2 thoughts on “Rorke’s Drift

  1. Don Fagerberg


    What is a “mealie bag?”


    Don Fagerberg, Founder Ministry Mentors enhances the professional effectiveness of active clergy, strengthens their personal and spiritual health, and affirms their gifts for ministry.

    Phone: 847-729-1644

    NOTICE: This e-mail is from Ministry Mentors and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer, and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you properly received this e-mail you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the clergy-client, work product privilege, or other applicable privileges that may be available to protect confidentiality.


  2. Dave Snell

    The amount of historical accuracy in the film depends, I suppose, on one’s threshold for such, and the arena in which the film is being considered. Look up – Movie errors Zulu – and learn all you ever wanted to know about its c o m p l e t e historical precision. What aggrieves me most is:
    •The film’s totally-slanderous misrepresentation of Hook. Think “total opposite” and you’ll be exponentially closer to the truth.
    •The business of the Zulus on the ridge line singing in recognition of their brave/fearsome/noble opponents is pure, fully-licensed, flapdoodle. It’s embarrassing that the Brits could ever imagine such a thing.
    •The business about the Zulu’s first “testing the (Brits’) guns” prior to battle is preposterous. Zulu’s had no experience whatsoever with attacking fortified positions; it played no part in their concept/culture of battle.) That’s something Napoleon would do, not a Zulu commander.
    Is this one of my most-favorite movies of all time? Of course. That’s how I can talk like this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s