Civil Discourse

[A new one] In November 2018, I had a commentary published in the Chicago Tribune. It responded to an editorial about the animosity Americans felt – then – about our nation’s politics. My comments were as follows. . . . .

I want to help the poor and eliminate hunger and poverty in America.  And around the world.  America needs a strong economy where everyone will benefit.   I want to improve education for all students – especially those in schools that serve our nation’s poorest young people. Crime, injustice and prejudice have no place in America.  We need respect for all people. We need freedom of speech – on campuses and in politics.  And yet we need mutual respect for those with whom we disagree without violence or disruption.

I want a controlled border – while having a fair and compassionate immigration policy allowing immigrants to seek the American dream.  We need to deal with pollution and protect our environment. I want a strong military and yet I yearn for peace for America and among nations.  Thus we need to reach out to friends and potential adversaries alike seeking global tranquility. I love my family and I want my grandchildren to grow up healthy, happy, safe and wise – and to live with a spirit of faith, hope and charity.  And I would like that for your family as well.  

So what am I – a Republican or Democrat? 

While there may be one or two hot button issues. I like to think that most Americans – irrespective of political labels — share similar feelings on the issues above. Though we may differ on how best to address these issues – that is where civil discourse, compromise and conciliation come into play.   Democracy requires it.  Animosity and anger do not work . . . .

Leave a comment