On April 5th, Peggy Noonan’s column in The Wall Street Journal offered comment on Trump’s sudden escalation of tension between America and its allies — especially Canada — by dramatically increasing tariff levels (see https://peggynoonan.com/ ). Who isn’t troubled by Prime Minister Mark Carney’s comment that “The old relationship we had with the United States . . . . is over.” While it may be justified, I do believe this tariff thing could have been accomplished more productively. And amicably. So I sent a note to the Journal which was published in the Saturday/Sunday April 12 and 13 issue:
Ms. Noonan suggests that the U.S. should first try to work out its differences with Canada. Having been an attorney for 53 years, I was involved in negotiations on a daily basis. One thing I learned early about success: be as nice as you can be and as tough as you have to be. One of the reasons that 85 to 90% of lawsuits settle before going to trial is that – if they advance, there is a 100% chance that someone will lose. Thus the resolution of differences is like drinking a warm Pepsi Cola on a hot day. It isn’t particularly satisfying but it’s better than ongoing thirst.
The decision to spring massive tariffs on our neighbors, allies and the world without the benefit of rational discussion is like going to trial. America may lose — and perhaps stay thirsty.
From reading subsequent articles and editorials (and follow up comments), I gather that most folks believe the same objective could have been achieved without the hostility. And antagonism. What do you think?