[A timely update of April 30, 2017] Federal law mandates the enforcement of immigration laws. Though the Supreme Court requires states to make social services available to all residents irrespective of immigration status. The high court also prohibits the federal government from forcing states to enforce federal law (at their own expense). Thus in America, some municipalities (and states) openly defy federal law. And there’s the rub. . . . .
Millions of people around the world would love to move to the United States. The poor. Homeless. Uneducated. Unemployed. The question is — should we open our borders to them? All of them? Those who sponsor “sanctuary cities” say “yes.” Those who favor open borders say “yes.” And lately, we have.
Some communities require no showing of legal residence to receive drivers licenses, free education, free hospitalization, food stamps, welfare, unemployment compensation, subsidized housing, the right to sue and so on. Even the right to vote. We seem to be opening America’s arms (and wallets) to everyone. Without limitation. This leads to the logical question of who’s gonna foot the bill?
Some well-meaning though politically-motivated people are fine with open borders — without addressing the underlying problems faced by immigrants in their own countries. And our own. This has led to the divisive and costly (and potentially dangerous) dilemma we face today. So what’s the answer? You tell me. . . . .
[Post script – Chicago – a sanctuary city – is enraged at having 25,000 immigrants to deal with. Yet Texas has to deal with millions of immigrants — and Texas gets criticized for sharing this crisis with other states. Wouldn’t it be more productive to work together to address the underlying problem?]